With eight CE-marked AI tools for prostate MRI currently available, deciding which solution best fits your clinical workflow can be challenging. In this insightful commentary, Tobias Penzkofer discusses his approach to choosing the right prostate AI solution for his clinic. He emphasizes the importance of evaluating various factors, such as the software’s integration with existing systems, user-friendliness, and its performance metrics in clinical settings.
While Penzkofer focuses on specific considerations for prostate AI, many of the insights he shares are relevant across all radiology AI applications. He encourages clinicians to thoroughly assess the software’s validation studies, including the extent of clinical validation and any published performance data, to ensure the solution meets their practice’s standards.
If you're still unsure whether adopting AI for prostate MR reporting is beneficial for your workflow, Penzkofer’s article offers a balanced perspective. He outlines the potential advantages, such as improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, while also addressing potential drawbacks, including implementation challenges and the learning curve for staff. Ultimately, his guidance provides valuable support for clinicians navigating the complexities of selecting the most suitable AI solution, ensuring that they make informed decisions that align with their practice needs and enhance patient care. Are you still in doubt whether you need an AI solution for prostate MR reporting? These two pieces tell you the pros and the cons.
Read full study
Prostate MRI: what to consider when shopping for AI tools
European Radiology. 2024 (commentary)